
Enterprise Execution Operating Model Design
Build the operating model AI can execute on.
Execution models must evolve for the agentic era.
We design what must change — and leave the rest alone.
Our Point of View
AI doesn’t just accelerate work. It changes how work is structured, how decisions are made, and how accountability holds as speed and complexity increase.
In the agentic era, work is increasingly designed AI-first. Humans operate primarily above the loop — steering outcomes, validating results, and intervening selectively where judgment and human connection matter most. Traditional operating models built around functional silos struggle to support this shift.
Every organization already has an operating model. Execution is happening now. The question is whether that model can hold under AI-enabled execution — or whether drift, risk, and misalignment quietly undermine performance.
Execution Operating Model Design addresses this challenge by focusing on execution as it actually operates today. The work centers on live workflows, decision logic, governance, and human–AI interaction — not abstract structures or target-state diagrams — where reliability, speed, and control must coexist.
What This Service Is
Execution Operating Model Design recalibrates how work, decisions, and AI operate together so execution integrity endures as systems scale.
​
This service is designed for organizations where execution reliability is being strained as AI increases speed, complexity, and risk — and and where execution improvement must occur within existing operating reality.
​​​​
HOW THIS WORKS IN PRACTICE This service establishes the structural conditions required for reliable execution in an AI-accelerated environment. It is a focused, system-level engagement that examines how work gets done when AI is in the mix — designing workflows, decision logic, governance, and human-AI interactions required for system reliability as complexity increases. ​ This is not org-chart design. Structure is addressed only where it materially enables or obstructs execution.​​​​​​​

What We Examine and Redesign
Design starts where performance actually lives: in the work.
Design begins from outcomes backward, shaping execution where structure, decision logic, and human–AI interaction materially affect performance.
​Intervention is intentional and selective — focused only where friction, misalignment, or risk materially impact execution​.
Areas of focus typically include:
-
​End-to-end workflows critical to executing strategy
-
​Decision ownership, escalation, and judgment allocation across humans and AI
-
Role accountability within execution-critical workflows
-
Human + AI orchestration where reliability, speed, and risk mitigation converge
-
Governance, operating rhythms and structural recommendations that enable coordinated team execution and alignment
What Leaders Walk Away With
-
Clear visibility into where execution is straining — and how leaders should respond
-
A shared execution model that aligns strategy, workflows, and decision-making across teams
-
Decisions that move faster with less escalation, even as AI increases complexity
-
Transparent roles and accountability designed to work in practice
​
-
Execution that scales without misalignment, rework, or dependency on heroics
​​
-
Confidence that AI investments are accelerating results, not just activity

How We Start
Engagement begins with a focused diagnostic: Friction to Flow™ — a human-centered, fast, and comprehensive starting point for organizations experiencing execution strain in AI-enabled work.
​
The output is not a report.
It is a clear set of design priorities that show where to intervene — and where not to.
A focused diagnostic examining:
-
Strategic intent versus execution reality
-
Priority workflows and decision points
-
Leadership and capability demands created by AI-enabled systems
-
Existing performance signals — and where measurement fails to inform action
Connection to the Execution Engine™
This service strengthens the Human + AI Partnership component of the Execution Engine™ — establishing the structural conditions required for execution reliability.
Without this work:
-
Leadership judgment is constrained
-
Performance signals disconnect from execution
-
AI amplifies noise instead of results
​​​
Together with Leadership Stewardship and Impact Intelligence™, this service ensures organizations can adapt, execute, and sustain performance as systems scale.

The defining challenge for modern organizations isn’t change itself, but the ability to perform as change accelerates.

